Friday, January 7, 2011

Why are the Shelves Empty?

Introduction

So, if you live in the MS, AL, or GA areas, I am sure you know that there is a winter storm coming. You have either seen it on the news or been called by your mom or member of you family to let you know--I am sure you can guess I am the ladder. However, you prepare for an emergency or crisis, I am sure you have been told by your parents or someone to do one thing: Go get water, gas, food, etc. Of course, there could be frozen water lines, roads that cannot be traversed, or empty shelves at the grocery. This is only natural right?

Well, I was sitting around thinking about going to the store, and a question hit me: why all the lines and empty shelves when it comes to gas and groceries during an emergency?

This is a question that I hope to address in this post.

Price Gouging

In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, Attorney General Jim Hood received thousands of complaints of "price gouging" by stores, hotels, and gas stations that were charging far higher prices than usual during this coming emergency. In Florida, it is illegal for a private company to charge much more during an emergency than the average price over the previous 30-day period. I know what you are thinking.. Right on! Finally, a government intervention that I can get behind. Companies shouldn't be able to "gouge" us when it comes to gas or other essentials.

What if I was to tell you that it is
precisely because these "good intentioned" laws are in place that our shelves of bottled water are empty, gas lines form, and people develop hysteria.

Role of Prices

What role do prices play in an economy? What are they for? Well, prices are not arbitrary number plucked out of the air. Prices are determined by a seller in order to recover their costs and force buyers to restrict how much they demand. When either the supply or demand of a product changes, the price of that product necessarily changes. The willingness and ability of buyers and sellers to trade in an open market established what a particular price should be. But, the wisdom of the state changes these facts in an emergency.

Consider a gas station convenience store along a relatively isolated highway after a hurricane. If the price of gas rose extremely high—to the market price of $10—people would only take as much of the expensive gas as they felt they needed, leaving spare gas for others. But if the price is set artificially low at current $3, those that arrive first will fill their tanks “just to be safe.” The same applies for the goods inside the store. Those first on the scene would take, say, five boxes of cereal apiece at a price of, say, $5. But if, due to scarcity, the price of the cereal box instead rose to, say, $95, each customer would likely take only one box. And just because the price increases does not mean that only the rich could afford the cereal. Poorer people could afford the first $95 box they really needed more easily than the rich could afford a second, third, or fifth box they don’t really need. Government-imposed price ceilings cause goods to become unavailable, whereas supplies would otherwise be available at some price.

Examples:

  • 1973-Nixon imposed price controls on oil--Gas lines result
  • 2000-California Gov. Gray Davis refused to lift controls on electricity--blackouts result
  • All rent control schemes

So, in a disaster area like the one MS experienced during Katrina, people are encouraged to take more than they need because the price is artificially low--thus resources are wrongly allocated. You see the same effects in bubbles when you couple a lower than market interest rate set by the Fed during recession, leading to easy money and a flow of capital into markets like dot.coms and housing that eventually pop. But, prices also provide an incentive for capital to flow into markets in positive way. Profit can always provide incentives for entrepreneurs to provide needs while making money. However, suppliers with the resources outside the affected areas most needed to help Mississippians are forbidden because of the artificially low price to not brave the elements, added risk, and looters because there is no incentive to gain profit. Therefore, the very people that the state is trying to help end up becoming victims of "good intentions."

Conclusion

The laws of economics are simple. Just remember: price ceilings cause shortages and price floors cause surpluses (empty water bottle shelves vs. minimum wage laws and higher unemployment among young workers). Trust the free market. It will always produce far better results than central planners in Jackson or D.C.

So, as you stand in line for gas during the winter storm or stare blankly at the empty shelves of water this weekend, just remember it is all courtesy of our government's "good intentions."



Check out this cameo from our AG :)

Blake


3 comments:

abeLowry said...

I agree completely, but I don't think the gas lines and empty shelves can be blamed on the government. In a world where so many have so little, we Americans have become so accustomed to having more than we deserve that we become greedy in times of desperation. We should learn to take what we NEED. No more, no less.

Blake Jeter said...

Abel,

I hear ya. Obviously, the government isn't the only culprit of empty shelves. There are a couple more things that come into play I'm sure. My main point is that artificial tinkering in the free market will always have some unintended consequences. Too often we except situations like this or something like inflation as just a natural part of life, but a lot of it can be explained economically.

I don't have so much of a problem with people having too much or taking more than they want provided that the market is unhindered and can respond accordingly. The price mechanism would automatically solve it in my opinion because the raising of the price would force people to take what they need because it would cost more than normal. If a price of plywood after a storm rose from $8 to $50, the "greedy" would be punished by the $42 premium they have to pay to get more than they need. If the price kept artficially low, then the rich or first in line do not have to pay a pentalty for their greed. It seems the absense of these laws and a free market would solve this issue, more than relying on people to do the moral thing and just take what they need. I think we agree on most here.

At any rate, just my two cents deposited!

Unknown said...

Jim Hood- "for people to take advantage of those in need violates every biblical standard of morals that I am aware of"

First off, we are not a Theocracy, we are a republic. Therefore the people of the great state of Mississippi are not bound by any religious code of morals or ethics as far as the government is concerned. Yes, Christians should help there brothers in need, and the same applies for anyone else who claims to be a follower of any religion that stipulates helping those in need, however, the state cannot enforce these codes of morals. Some people may be Christian, some Hindu, and some agnostic but the state cannot impose any moral standard to the group that is not law. The citizens and denizens are bound by the constitution of Mississippi and the laws of the State. But if any one wish to challenge the laws of the state they can do so in open court and either have the law upheld or overturned on grounds of constitutionality.

Second, if someone is claiming to be a Christian and does "price gouge," let him do it. Maybe that shop owner wants to make sure he has goods to sell should a needy person come in his store to trade. The shop owner might even go so far as to give to the needy the goods because he has made extra profit from all the other sales.

There is no good reason for the state to persecute any entrepreneur for bringing goods to the market and selling them at market price. If your wondering what market price is, it is what a person in a specific location is willing to pay for a good and what the entrepreneur is willing to accept for the good. If those two criteria are not met, the transaction will not be made. No one is forcing anyone to purchase anything they don't want, except for health insurance.